References#
George E. P. Box. Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356):791–799, 1976. doi:10.1080/01621459.1976.10480949.
Leo Breiman. Statistical modeling: the two cultures. Statistical Science, 16(3):199–231, 2001. doi:10.1214/ss/1009213726.
Thomas H. Davenport and D. J. Patil. Data scientist: the sexiest job of the 21st century. Harvard Business Review, 90(10):70–76, 2012. URL: https://hbr.org/2012/10/data-scientist-the-sexiest-job-of-the-21st-century.
Dean De Cock. Ames, iowa: alternative to the boston housing data as an end of semester regression project. Journal of Statistics Education, 2011.
David Donoho. 50 years of data science. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 26(4):745–766, 2017. doi:10.1080/10618600.2017.1384734.
Frank Watson Dyson, Arthur Stanley Eddington, and C. Davidson. A determination of the deflection of light by the sun's gravitational field, from observations made at the total eclipse of May 29, 1919. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 220:291–333, 1920. doi:10.1098/rsta.1920.0009.
Eric G. Forbes. Gauss and the discovery of Ceres. Journal for the History of Astronomy, 2(3):195–199, 1971. doi:10.1177/002182867100200305.
Neal Jean, Marshall Burke, Michael Xie, W. Matthew Davis, David B. Lobell, and Stefano Ermon. Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty. Science, 353(6301):790–794, 2016. doi:10.1126/science.aaf7894.
Jon Kleinberg, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Jure Leskovec, Jens Ludwig, and Sendhil Mullainathan. Human decisions and machine predictions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(1):237–293, 2018. doi:10.1093/qje/qjx032.
Jon Kleinberg, Jens Ludwig, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Ziad Obermeyer. Prediction policy problems. American Economic Review, 105(5):491–495, 2015. doi:10.1257/aer.p20151023.
Wes McKinney. Python for Data Analysis. O'Reilly Media, 3rd edition, 2022. URL: https://wesmckinney.com/book/.
John F. Padgett and Christopher K. Ansell. Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6):1259–1319, 1993. doi:10.1086/230190.
Jaeyoon Park, Jungsam Lee, Katherine Seto, Timothy Hochberg, Brian A. Wong, Nathan A. Miller, Kenji Takasaki, Hiroshi Kubota, Yoshioki Oozeki, Sejal Doshi, Maya Midzik, Quentin Hanich, Brian Sullivan, Paul Woods, and David A. Kroodsma. Illuminating dark fishing fleets in North Korea. Science Advances, 6(30):eabb1197, 2020. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb1197.
Jeffrey M. Perkel. Why Jupyter is data scientists' computational notebook of choice. Nature, 563(7729):145–146, 2018. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-07196-1.
João Felipe Pimentel, Leonardo Murta, Vanessa Braganholo, and Juliana Freire. A large-scale study about quality and reproducibility of Jupyter notebooks. In 2019 IEEE/ACM 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), 507–517. IEEE, 2019. doi:10.1109/MSR.2019.00077.
Thomas J. Sargent and John Stachurski. Economic Networks: Theory and Computation. Cambridge University Press, 2024. doi:10.1017/9781009456340.
Latanya Sweeney. Simple demographics often identify people uniquely. Data Privacy Working Paper 3, Carnegie Mellon University, 2000. URL: https://dataprivacylab.org/projects/identifiability/paper1.pdf.
John W. Tukey. The future of data analysis. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33(1):1–67, 1962. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177704711.
Lukas Twist, Mark Harman, Don Syme, Joost Noppen, Helen Yannakoudakis, Detlef Nauck, and Jie M. Zhang. A study of LLMs' preferences for libraries and programming languages. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.17181, 2025. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.17181.